Skip to content
Yeich Media

01What you receive

See the shape of the document before you pay for it.

The Audit produces one written report. This is its table of contents, what each section contains, and the form each one takes.

02What this is

This is the format, not a case study.

There are no findings, numbers, or client names on this page, because every one of them would have to be invented. Yeich Media has not published a sanitised real engagement and will not fabricate one to fill this space. What is shown is the structure of the deliverable itself, which is the part you are actually buying and the part we can describe completely and truthfully.

Your readout contains your workflows, your systems, and findings pointed back to where they were observed so your team can check each one.

03Contents

Eight sections, in this order.

Typically 10 business days

  1. 01

    Current-state workflow map

    A shared picture of how the work moves today, before anyone proposes changing it.

    Form

    A lane diagram per workflow, plus the exceptions each one hits.

    Answers

    • Where does the work start, and how many places can it start from?
    • Which steps are already automatic, and which need a person?
    • Where does it stall, and who is waiting on whom?
  2. 02

    Tool and data inventory

    What your systems can and cannot do, established rather than assumed.

    Form

    A table of systems, what each holds, and what it can export.

    Answers

    • What is your system of record for each kind of information?
    • What can be read out of it, and by what method?
    • What is entered twice today, and where?
  3. 03

    Opportunity shortlist

    The three to five workflows worth evaluating, and the ones deliberately set aside.

    Form

    A short list, each with a one-line reason for being on it.

    Answers

    • Which workflows are repeated often enough to be worth automating?
    • Which are stable enough to describe as rules?
    • Which were considered and ruled out, and why?
  4. 04

    Prioritization scorecard

    Which one to do first, decided against stated criteria rather than instinct.

    Form

    A ranked table scored on impact, effort, risk, and readiness.

    Answers

    • What is the highest-impact change we could make?
    • What is the cheapest change that still matters?
    • What are we not ready for yet?
  5. 05

    ROI assumptions

    The arithmetic behind the recommendation, shown so you can disagree with it.

    Form

    A model with every input labelled and editable, not a single number.

    Answers

    • How much time does this workflow consume today, and how do we know?
    • What would change, and by how much?
    • Which assumptions is the case most sensitive to?
  6. 06

    Implementation recommendation

    What building the first workflow would actually involve.

    Form

    A written scope: what is in, what is out, and who owns each part.

    Answers

    • What exactly gets built, and against which systems?
    • What stays with your team, permanently and by design?
    • What has to be true before work starts?
  7. 07

    90-day roadmap

    The sequence after the first workflow, so the audit does not end at one project.

    Form

    A dated sequence of what to test, build, measure, and improve.

    Answers

    • What happens in the first two weeks?
    • What is deliberately deferred, and until when?
    • What would tell us to stop?
  8. 08

    Executive readout

    The written report the rest of the document supports.

    Form

    Findings, each pointed back to where it was observed so your team can verify it, and the recommendation those findings lead to.

    Answers

    • What did you find?
    • How do we check that for ourselves?
    • What do you recommend we do about it?

04Next step

Find the workflow worth improving first.

The assessment call is free and produces a named bottleneck, whether or not you go further. The Audit is what turns that into the document above.